Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41179848›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2025

Estimating the effect size of moral contagion in online networks: A pre-registered replication and meta-analysis.

William J Brady, Steve Rathje, Laura K Globig, Jay J Van Bavel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Unfiltered Access, Unseen Harms: A Developmental and Public Health Critique of Digital Rights Discourse.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Review
  3. The cultural ecology of social media.Evolutionary human sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

William J BradyDepartment of Management and Organizations, Northwestern University, Kellogg School of Management, 2211 N Campus Dr, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6075-5446
Steve RathjeDepartment of Psychology, New York University, 6 Washington Place, New York, NY 10012, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6727-571X
Laura K GlobigDepartment of Psychology, New York University, 6 Washington Place, New York, NY 10012, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0612-0594
Jay J Van BavelDepartment of Psychology, New York University, 6 Washington Place, New York, NY 10012, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2520-0442

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over 5 billion people now use social media platforms. As our social lives become increasingly entangled with online social networks, it is important to understand the dynamics of online information diffusion. This is particularly true for the political domain, as political elites, disinformation profiteers, and social activists all use social media to gain influence by spreading information. Recent work found that emotional expressions related to morality (moral-emotion expression) are associated with increased diffusion of political messages-a phenomenon we called "moral contagion." Here, we perform a large, pre-registered direct replication (

Indexed as

emotionsmeta-analysismoralityreplicationsocial media

Identifiers

PMID41179848
PMCPMC12578369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.