Article in MycoKeys, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Xu ZhangMinistry of Education Key Laboratory for Ecology of Tropical Islands, Key Laboratory of Tropical Animal and Plant Ecology of Hainan Province, College of Life Sciences, Hainan Normal University, Haikou, China Hainan Normal University Haikou China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1283-0573
Xin-Ni LiMinistry of Education Key Laboratory for Ecology of Tropical Islands, Key Laboratory of Tropical Animal and Plant Ecology of Hainan Province, College of Life Sciences, Hainan Normal University, Haikou, China Hainan Normal University Haikou China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8069-5241
Wei-Qing LiangCenter for Medicinal Resources Research, Zhejiang Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, China Center for Medicinal Resources Research, Zhejiang Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine Hangzhou China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2948-0845
Xiao-Dong MuHainan Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Haikou, China Hainan Research Academy of Environmental Sciences Haikou China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9375-0727
Ye-Fei YuZhejiang Dapanshan National Natural Reserve Administration, Panan, China Zhejiang Dapanshan National Natural Reserve Administration Panan China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4890-5845
Xiao-Jun WuCenter for Medicinal Resources Research, Zhejiang Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, China Center for Medicinal Resources Research, Zhejiang Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine Hangzhou China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4184-6331
Si-Yu ChenMinistry of Education Key Laboratory for Ecology of Tropical Islands, Key Laboratory of Tropical Animal and Plant Ecology of Hainan Province, College of Life Sciences, Hainan Normal University, Haikou, China Hainan Normal University Haikou China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6597-3081
Jin-Bao PuCenter for Medicinal Resources Research, Zhejiang Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, China Center for Medicinal Resources Research, Zhejiang Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine Hangzhou China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4911-1169
Nian-Kai ZengMinistry of Education Key Laboratory for Ecology of Tropical Islands, Key Laboratory of Tropical Animal and Plant Ecology of Hainan Province, College of Life Sciences, Hainan Normal University, Haikou, China Hainan Normal University Haikou China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7651-4524
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
The subfamily Chalciporoideae, an early diverging lineage within Boletaceae (Boletales), is ecologically significant and economically promising. However, research on species diversity within the subfamily in China is still insufficient. In this study, detailed morphological examinations and molecular phylogenetic analyses were conducted on specimens collected from various regions in China. Three genera in Chalciporoideae, viz.
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
The subfamily Chalciporoideae (Boletaceae, Boletales) in China. · full record | OpenQuestion