Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41179826›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Concern about the possibility of becoming a victim of extortion: validation of a brief scale for Peruvian citizens.

Oscar Mamani-Benito, Renzo Felipe Carranza Esteban, María Celinda Cruz Ordinola, Mariné Huayta-Meza, Cristhian Cruz-Campos, Milagros Yesenia Pacheco-Vizcarra, Wilter C Morales-Garcia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Oscar Mamani-BenitoFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Señor de Sipán, Chiclayo, Peru.
Renzo Felipe Carranza EstebanGrupo de Investigación Avances en Investigación Psicológica, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Peru.
María Celinda Cruz OrdinolaFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Señor de Sipán, Chiclayo, Peru.
Mariné Huayta-MezaFacultad de Ciencias Empresariales, Universidad Peruana Unión, Juliaca, Peru.
Cristhian Cruz-CamposFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Peruana Unión, Juliaca, Peru.
Milagros Yesenia Pacheco-VizcarraFacultad de Ciencias Contables y Administrativas, Universidad Nacional del Altiplano, Puno, Peru.
Wilter C Morales-GarciaDirección General de Investigación, Universidad Peruana Unión, Lima, Peru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The phenomenon of extortion is generating serious repercussions on the mental health of the economically active population. In the absence of measurement instruments to quantify the magnitude of this problem, it becomes urgent to design a documentary measurement tool. Objective: To design and validate a scale measuring concern about the possibility of becoming a victim of extortion. Method: The study is classified as instrumental. Using purposive non-probability sampling, participation was obtained from 2.049 citizens of both sexes across the three regions of Peru. The instrument was designed in 10 stages, following expert recommendations on the subject. The first version consisted of 11 items with five-point Likert-type response options. Analyses were conducted to demonstrate content validity, construct validity, convergent validity, measurement invariance, and reliability. Results: All items proved to be clear, relevant, and representative (V > 0.70). Exploratory factor analysis suggested an underlying structure composed of eight items (KMO = 0.91, Bartlett's test = p ≤ 0.001), with factor loadings above the 0.40 cutoff (0.75 to 0.83). Subsequently, confirmatory factor analysis corroborated this unidimensional structure (SRMR = 0.037, RMSEA = 0.074, CFI = 0.996, TLI = 0.994). In addition, the BECS was shown to be invariant across sex and exhibited significant correlations with other comparable scales, thus providing evidence of convergent validity. Finally, the instrument demonstrated excellent reliability (>0.90). Conclusion: The BECS shows psychometric evidence supporting its validity and reliability. Therefore, it becomes the first measure available to assess concern about the possibility of becoming a victim of extortion.

Indexed as

extortion concernmental healthPeruvian populationpsychometric validationunidimensional scale

Identifiers

PMID41179826
PMCPMC12577558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.