ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Machine learning analysis of posturography in panic disorder: a pilot study for objective physiological biomarker identification.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Panic disorder (PD) is linked to subtle abnormalities in postural control, which are inadequately captured by traditional statistics. Machine learning (ML) techniques applied to stabilometric data may enhance the detection of PD-related postural patterns. Objective: Evaluate static postural control in PD patients and determine if ML analysis of multivariate stabilometric data can improve differentiation from healthy controls. Methods: In this cross-sectional case-control study, 12 adults diagnosed with DSM-5 PD and 21 matched healthy volunteers (total n = 33; 341 force platform trials) underwent stabilometry under five sensory conditions. Classical statistics used repeated-measures ANOVA on baseline trials only (to preserve independence). ML models (Decision Tree, k-Nearest Neighbors, Linear Discriminant Analysis, Logistic Regression, and Random Forest) were trained under stratified, subject-grouped, fourfold cross-validation (StratifiedGroupKFold), ensuring that all trials from each participant were confined to a single fold to prevent leakage. For the explainability of the model, Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) was accessed. Results: ANOVA revealed a significant group and condition interaction for mediolateral center of pressure (CoP) displacement (p < 0.01), with PD patients exhibiting consistently reduced mediolateral sway. No significant between-group differences emerged for anteroposterior sway. Using an optimized decision threshold (Youden), Logistic Regression achieved an accuracy of 93.8% and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 96%; Linear Discriminant Analysis presented the highest specificity (91.7%). Conclusions: This is the first study applying ML to posturography for identifying physiological markers of panic disorder. Using ML for stabilometric data improves classification accuracy, highlighting static posturography as superior to clinical screening tools like the Patient Health Questionnaire for Panic Disorder (PHQ-PD) and Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS). Larger, externally validated cohorts and portable measurement solutions are needed to translate these findings into routine clinical assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.