ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Lessons learned from Vietnam's first COVID-19 vaccine rollout: tackling vaccine hesitancy and misinformation for future pandemic responses.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Vaccine hesitancy and misinformation significantly undermine pandemic preparedness. Insights from the COVID-19 vaccine rollout can inform and enhance future pandemic responses. During Vietnam's Delta outbreak in 2021, the vaccine rollout faced significant challenges including limited vaccine supply and public vaccine hesitancy, which impeded widespread coverage. Objectives: This study examined levels of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, common information sources, exposure to negative vaccine-related information, and intentions to promote vaccination among the Vietnamese public. Methods: A national cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2021 with 1,579 participants recruited through the snowball sampling method. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with vaccine hesitancy. Results: Overall, 30.6% of respondents were vaccine hesitators. Hesitancy was significantly higher among females [adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) = 1.438, 95% CI: 1.132-1.892, Conclusions: Addressing vaccine hesitancy in future outbreaks of COVID-19 and other infectious diseases requires combating misinformation, especially on social media, and improving vaccine knowledge among lower-education groups. Individuals in health-related sectors and those who have previously paid for vaccinations can serve as role models in promoting vaccination. Clear, culturally appropriate communication and sustained government are vital to counter the infodemic, build trust, and improve vaccine uptake in future pandemics. Due to snowball sampling, the study findings may not generalize to rural, older, or less-educated populations. Future studies should consider stratified sampling to improve representativeness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.