Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41179789›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model and online web-based calculator based on social-ecosystem theory for early prediction of postpartum depression: a longitudinal study.

Shusen Lin, Peng Wang, Chongyu Yue, Guofang Kuang, Xuefei Han, Yanxia Zhang, Xiaojing Wang, Min Wang, Shanshan Huan, Xinwei Zhang and 2 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shusen LinSchool of Nursing, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Peng WangQingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Chongyu YueAffiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Guofang KuangAffiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Xuefei HanSchool of Nursing, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Yanxia ZhangSchool of Nursing, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Xiaojing WangSchool of Nursing, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Min WangQingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Shanshan HuanQingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Xinwei ZhangAffiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Ping TanAffiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Huawei LiSchool of Nursing, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postpartum depression (PPD) has emerged as a global public health issue that can cause significant harm to mothers and their families. Currently, there is an urgent need for a robust early risk prediction model to enable accurate predictions of postpartum depression in hospitals. Methods: This was a longitudinal study. Using social ecosystem theory, we collected multi-dimensional and multi-angle risk factors for early postpartum depression from delivery to discharge, and conducted 42-day postpartum follow-ups using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). We strictly adhered to the Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) checklist, used 10 machine learning (ML) algorithms to construct and validate the prediction model, and employed the Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) algorithm to explain the model. Risk stratification was performed through K-Means clustering analysis, ultimately resulting in an clinical screening tool for early PPD risk prediction. Results: The results showed that by comparing the performance of prediction models constructed by the 10 ML algorithms, the model constructed using the random forest algorithm was selected as the best, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.85-0.96) and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.70-0.85) in internal and external validation. Low risk probability (0, 0.26], medium risk probability (0.26, 0.63), and high risk probability (0.63, 1) were obtained through K-Means clustering analysis, and the SHAP value of the model was interpreted. Finally, we developed an online risk prediction calculator. Conclusion: This study developed an interpretable risk prediction model for early PPD, which may help healthcare providers to identify and implement intervention measures early, preventing the occurrence of PPD.

Indexed as

Depression, PostpartumInternetMachine LearningAdultAlgorithmsFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk Factorsclustering algorithmsmachine learningpostpartum depressionpredictive learning modelsrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID41179789
PMCPMC12575091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.