Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41179778›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Using the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model to inform meaningful partner engagement and the selection of implementation strategies to increase colorectal cancer screening in federally qualified health centers.

Jesse Nodora, Samir Gupta, Samantha Hurst, Aimee S James, Borsika A Rabin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jesse NodoraDepartment of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, Community Outreach and Engagement, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
Samir GuptaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
Samantha HurstHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
Aimee S JamesDivision of Public Health Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Borsika A RabinHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, UC San Diego Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute, Dissemination and Implementation Science Center, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Engaging community partners in research meaningfully can guide effective implementation efforts. This approach is particularly crucial when we work with complex, multilevel programs in low-resource settings that serve diverse populations. The application of dissemination and implementation science theories, models, and frameworks to facilitate the iterative, multilevel engagement of partners in selecting and optimizing implementation strategies is not commonly described in the literature. In collaboration with three federally qualified health centers in San Diego County, we utilized the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM), which is a contextually expanded version of the widely used Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, to guide partner-engaged data collection on processes, resources, facilitators, and barriers for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We gathered implementation-relevant information from each FQHC, including partner introductory meetings, an Agile Science workshop, secondary data collection, surveys, and in-depth interviews. Insights from the PRISM domains led to the development of process maps that guided the selection of implementation strategies to support the use of evidence-based interventions for CRC screening.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerMass ScreeningSafety-net ProvidersCaliforniaHumansImplementation ScienceProgram Evaluationcolorectal cancer screeningimplementation strategiespragmatic robust implementation and sustainability modelRE-AIMunderserved communities

Identifiers

PMID41179778
PMCPMC12571863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.