ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
A deep learning approach integrating multi-dimensional features for expert matching in healthcare question answering communities.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To address the demand for precise patient-medical expert matching in online healthcare Q&A communities, this study proposes a multi-feature health community expert recommendation model integrating GRU, convolutional neural networks (CNN), and attention mechanisms. By analyzing textual semantic features from patients' question titles, content, tags and personal profiles, while incorporating medical experts' professional credentials information and historical reply sequences, we construct a recommendation framework with multi-dimensional feature fusion. The CNN model extracts deep semantic information from patient inquiries, coupled with a bidirectional GRU network to align with experts' specialized medical domains, thereby optimizing recommendation accuracy and relevance. Experimental results demonstrate significant improvements in recommendation precision compared to traditional text matching methods (e.g., LSTM) and previous state-of-the-art approaches, particularly in handling unstructured, short-text, and multi-domain classification scenarios. This research provides technical references for resource optimization and personalized services in online medical communities, offering practical implementation value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.