ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Measuring the relationship between social capital, race, and education.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Enhancing social and community support (e.g., social capital) is essential for building healthier communities, as social capital significantly influences health outcomes. However, the relationship between social capital, race, and education is complex. Historically marginalized groups often face systemic barriers that reduce their social capital. Therefore, longitudinal research is essential to understand these dynamics and address health disparities. This study explores the relationship between social capital, race, and education in U.S. adults over time, using Midlife in the U.S. (MIDUS) data from Waves 1-3 (1995-1996; 2004-2006; 2013-2014). We used the disparity assessment framework from Ward et al. and multilevel mixed-effects models to investigate how social capital evolved differently based on race and education as well as the potential implications of these differences. Our findings revealed that Black respondents consistently demonstrated higher community contributions and community involvement compared with White respondents, despite having lower education on average. This social capital advantage for Black respondents persisted across all three waves of the MIDUS study. Longitudinal analysis also showed that community contributions remained stable at all time points for all respondents, while community involvement declined at MIDUS 3. However, Black respondents exhibited a prominent increase in community involvement at MIDUS 3, suggesting that Black communities may have adapted and thrived through culturally specific forms of social capital during that period. Our findings indicated these positive manifestations of social capital should be explored to see how it can be supported and suggested the need for further exploration of racial dynamics and culturally specific forms of social capital.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.