ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Social prescribing for socially isolated older adults in rural Japan: a qualitative case study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Community-Based Participatory Research to Promote Social Inclusion in a Rural Town in Japan: Process Evaluation of a Pre-COVID-19 Collaboration Among Residents and Professionals.Journal of general and family medicine · 2026Article
- Employment in Later Life: Its Multiple Benefits, Challenges, and Future Outlook.Geriatrics & gerontology international · 2026Review
- Social prescribing by community nurses in southeastern Australia: a qualitative study.Journal of research in nursing : JRN · 2026Article
- Thematic analysis of how general practitioners perceive digital social prescribing as an intervention aiming at promoting psychosocial health and wellbeing in older adults.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Social prescribing (SP) has not yet been officially introduced in Japan. This qualitative case study aimed to identify the challenges and facilitating factors in the implementation of SP among the socially isolated older population in Akita Prefecture, Japan, based on the perspectives of general practitioners (GP), link workers (LW), and patients. Method: We conducted a qualitative case study using semi-structured interviews and Braun & Clarke-informed thematic analysis in seven medical districts in Akita, Japan, with GP ( Results: Participants (GP and LW) emphasized that SP needed to be tailored to individual needs and that LW played a vital role as social resources in sparsely populated rural communities. The project was publicly funded; participants emphasized that, in the absence of financial support, intrinsic motivation would be important to sustaining implementation. Both groups raised concerns about ensuring LW's competencies, the accessibility and cost of community resources, and the limited availability of such resources in rural areas. Patients highlighted that the effectiveness of SP varied by personal characteristics, and that transport barriers significantly restricted participation, highlighting the need for local support to mitigate this challenge. Establishing patients' trust in LW and GP, along with effective communication, was viewed as essential for identifying and addressing patient-level barriers. Conclusion: In rural, resource-constrained settings such as Akita, successful SP depends on tailoring to individual needs, ensuring LW competence, and addressing transport barriers. These findings suggest that future policies should focus on sustainable funding for LW, integration with existing health and welfare systems, and mobility solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.