Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41179639›Full record

ReviewArchives of Razi Institute2025

Harnessing

Arzani Fatemeh, Mostofi Fakhrani Zahra, Omeanzadeh Alireza, Safarian Samin, Soltani Danial, Soroushianfar Mahdi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of Razi Institute, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Microorganisms · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arzani FatemehDepartment of Graduate student of the Plant Biology, University of Nazlu Urmia, Iran.
Mostofi Fakhrani ZahraIslamic Azad University of Shoushtar, Khuzestan, Iran.
Omeanzadeh AlirezaMashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Safarian SaminMashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Soltani DanialMashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Soroushianfar MahdiDepartment of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The escalating mortality and morbidity rates have prompted global attention to focus on cancer, with the exploration of new treatment options being a key priority. The utilisation of immunotherapy for recurrent or metastatic cancer has emerged as a promising option over the years, despite its limitations in comparison to traditional treatment options. Among the various immunotherapeutic approaches, bacterial-based vectors such as Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) have attracted considerable attention on account of their distinctive characteristics. The utilisation of these vectors entails the exploitation of their capacity to invade antigen-presenting cells (APCs), proliferate intracellularly within immune cells, and disseminate within these cells, thereby augmenting their efficacy in modulating immune responses. It is important to note that the use of bacterial vectors significantly minimises the risks associated with off-target effects. The antitumor effects of Lm can be observed through the reduction of immunosuppressive cells in the tumor microenvironment as well as the stimulation of T cells. Research has indicated that a range of tumour cell types can be targeted by modified Lm vaccines. However, it is acknowledged that Lm vaccines alone may not be sufficient for a comprehensive cancer treatment. Consequently, the employment of Lm vaccines in conjunction with other therapeutic modalities, such as radiotherapy, reactivated adoptive cell therapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitors, has the potential to yield superior outcomes. Consequently, the present review aims to elaborate on recent advancements in the understanding of the antitumor properties of Lm vaccines. The objective of this review is to provide insights into optimising the therapeutic potential of Lm vaccines by comprehensively examining their interplay with the immune system. In order to harness the full therapeutic potential of Lm vaccines in the fight against cancer, researchers and clinicians must gain a deeper understanding of the mechanisms involved.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesImmunotherapyListeria monocytogenesNeoplasmsAnimalsHumansCancer VaccinesCancerCancer vaccineImmunotherapyListeria monocytogenesTumor

Identifiers

PMID41179639
PMCPMC12572677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.