ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Construction of a predictive model for in-hospital mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting prolonged intensive care unit stay in patients with acute myocardial infarction and analysis of associated hospitalization costs.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of the atherogenic index of plasma combined with lactate-to-albumin ratio for in-hospital mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) carries a substantial risk of morbidity and mortality. However, a validated clinical prediction model for in-hospital mortality in these patients is still lacking. This study seeks to develop and validate a mortality risk prediction tool to assist clinicians in early identification of high-risk patients and guide personalized therapeutic interventions. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical data from 1,419 patients diagnosed with AMI. Of these, 150 patients with AMI complicated by CS were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to a training group (70%) or a testing group (30%). Following logistic regression analysis, variables were selected using LASSO regression. Seven candidate predictors were selected for inclusion in the final nomogram model. Model performance was assessed through the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), decision curve analysis (DCA), and calibration curves. Results: A total of 150 patients with AMI complicated by CS were included in the study. In-hospital mortality occurred in 41 patients (27.33%). Eleven variables, including age, smokers, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), were identified as potential predictors of in-hospital mortality. The final nomogram incorporated the following independent predictors: age, LVEF, creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (Hs-CRP), β-blocker use, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEI/ARB) use, and statin use. During internal validation, the nomogram demonstrated AUC values of 0.941 in the training sets and 0.981 in the testing sets. Both calibration curves and DCA showed excellent agreement between predicted probabilities and observed outcomes. Conclusion: This study developed and internally validated a clinically applicable prediction model and nomogram for assessing the risk of in-hospital mortality among patients with AMI complicated by CS. The results offer readily applicable insights to guide clinical practitioners in implementing timely, personalized patient management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.