ArticleJournal of public health research2025
Diagnostic related groups-based reimbursement in Kazakhstan: Have we learned enough?
Article in Journal of public health research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Kazakhstan implemented a diagnosis-related group (DRG)-based payment system in 2012, transitioning from a fee-for-service remuneration model for public hospitals. The reform aimed to enhance hospital efficiency and cost control. A national rollout was preceded by a pilot phase involving 21 hospitals in 2011. While DRG systems are increasingly adopted and adapted globally, evidence on their effects remains limited in low- and middle-income countries. Objective: To assess whether the introduction of the DRG-based system is associated with changes in hospital activity and the quality of care. Design and methods: A controlled interrupted time series design was employed, using matched control hospitals to estimate the causal impact of the payment reform. The analysis was based on weekly hospital discharge data from the 2011/2012 to 2012/2013 fiscal years, obtained from the Ministry of Health. Result: Findings suggest that the impact of the reform on hospital activity varied by hospital levels, with pilot hospitals showing a quicker response to nationwide implementation. No significant effects were observed on quality of care, as measured by standardised in-hospital mortality rates. Conclusions: The introduction of the DRG-based payment system was associated with heterogenous effects on hospital activity but did not yield measurable short-term improvements in care quality. These findings underscore the importance of implementation context and highlight the need for further research to assess long-term and system-wide effects.JEL classification: H51, I1, P36.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.