ReviewJournal of public health research2025
The global landscape of willingness to pay for community-based health insurance research: A bibliometric analysis.
Review in Journal of public health research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the global research landscape on Willingness to Pay (WTP) for Community-Based Health Insurance (CBHI) from 2002 to 2024. It seeks to identify key trends, influential contributors, regional disparities, and thematic focus areas, offering insights to guide future research and policy development. A bibliometric analysis was conducted using 354 documents sourced from Dimensions, Scopus, and PubMed. The Bibliometrix package in R Studio, along with the Biblioshiny application, was employed to examine publication trends, citation metrics, collaboration networks, and keyword distributions. Bradford's and Lotka's Laws were applied to evaluate journal productivity and author contribution patterns. Data visualizations, including geographical distribution maps and author productivity charts, were used to present findings. The analysis revealed an annual publication growth rate of 10.12%. Ethiopia led in research output (15.8%), while Burkina Faso's publications were most cited. International collaborations were present in 31.64% of studies, indicating increasing global engagement. Key publishing journals included
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.