Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41179489›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2025

Comparison of the preventive effects of proton pump inhibitors and vonoprazan on delayed bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Shohei Mukai, Kenichiro Okimoto, Tomoaki Matsumura, Tsubasa Ishikawa, Yuhei Oyama, Hayato Nakazawa, Yukiyo Mamiya, Satsuki Takahashi, Chihiro Goto, Ryosuke Horio and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Shohei MukaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Kenichiro OkimotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana, 1-8-1, Chiba City 260-8670, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5809-1254
Tomoaki MatsumuraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5314-9325
Tsubasa IshikawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Yuhei OyamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Hayato NakazawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Yukiyo MamiyaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Satsuki TakahashiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Chihiro GotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Ryosuke HorioDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Akane KurosugiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Michiko SonodaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Tatsuya KanekoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Yuki OhtaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Takashi TaidaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Keisuke MatsusakaDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Jun-Ichiro IkedaDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Jun KatoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is no consensus on whether proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or vonoprazan (VPZ) is superior in preventing delayed bleeding (DB) after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of the stomach. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of combined intravenous and oral PPI versus oral VPZ alone therapy in preventing DB after gastric ESD in a consecutive and large case series. Design: Retrospective study. Methods: This study included consecutive patients who underwent gastric ESD at Chiba University Hospital from January 2017 to July 2023. Before 2019, patients received intravenous omeprazole 20 mg in the morning and evening on the day of ESD and the day after. Thereafter, esomeprazole 20 mg was administered orally once daily, which was continued for generally 28 days (defined as the PPI group). From 2020 onward, patients received oral VPZ 20 mg once daily starting on the day of ESD, also typically continued for 28 days (defined as the VPZ group). DB rates between the PPI and VPZ groups were compared using propensity score matching. Results: There were 720 cases (856 tumors) of gastric ESD during the study period, of which 352 (409 tumors) were in the PPI group and 368 (447 tumors) in the VPZ group. Propensity score matching for 9 covariates related to DB rates for gastric ESD ultimately produced 329 best matches. There was no significant difference in DB rates between the two groups (4.3% vs 3.6%, Conclusion: Though further prospective studies are needed to draw definitive conclusions, it was suggested that the easily administered oral VPZ can be an important option for acid suppression after gastric ESD.

Indexed as

delayed bleedingendoscopic submucosal dissectionPPIvonoprazan

Identifiers

PMID41179489
PMCPMC12576220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.