ArticleJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2025
Delayed infection following axillary shoulder incisions.
Article in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis Using a Standard Suture Anchor Is Safe and Effective.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Shoulder Rice Body Bursitis: Arthroscopic Management and Mechanistic Implications.The American journal of case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although infections following shoulder surgery may be delayed beyond those seen following surgery in other joints, initial presentation of infection six months after surgery is rare. We report on unusual cases of delayed postoperative infection in patients treated through axillary incisions. Methods: Following institutional review board approval, data were collected through a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent surgical procedures involving axillary incisions by 2 surgeons between 2013 and 2021. During this time period, 378 surgeries were performed via axillary incisions for a variety of procedures including inferior capsular shift, biceps tenodesis, and pectoralis repair. Results: Only 4 cases of infection were identified in cases utilizing an axillary incision during a 9-year period and they all presented in a delayed fashion between 7 and 32 months postoperatively. All patients ultimately cleared their infection following surgical intervention. Conclusions: Clinicians must maintain a high level of suspicion for infection in patients presenting with surgical site pain following procedures involving axillary incisions, even in the context of a delayed presentation. Arthroscopic techniques may be considered as an alternative to open procedures, when practical, to minimize the possibility of infection. In the treatment of infected cases, a concerted effort to remove all foreign materials from the surgical site during irrigation and debridement may minimize the risk of recurrent infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.