ArticleJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2025
Subpectoral biceps tenodesis and transfer for rotator cuff tears: clinical and patient-reported outcomes-a case series.
Article in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Biceps autograft augmentation, performed by incorporating the long head of the biceps tendon into the rotator cuff repair construct, aims to leverage the biceps tendon tissue for collagen augmentation and biomechanical properties. Prior studies have demonstrated effectiveness of augmentation of rotator cuff tears using autologous biceps tendon transfer. We present a biceps augmentation technique that involves a subpectoral tenodesis proximal to the myotendinous junction while preserving the proximal long head of the biceps tendon origin on the supraglenoid tubercle. This case series aimed to assess the clinical, functional, and patient-reported outcomes following this novel surgical approach for rotator cuff repair. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent a subpectoral biceps tenodesis and transfer by a single fellowship-trained shoulder and elbow surgeon to augment large rotator cuff tears. Preoperative and postoperative chart review was conducted to compare shoulder flexion and abduction range of motion, as well as visual analog scale shoulder pain scores. At the final follow-up, an average of 19.6 ± 5.6 months postoperative, data were collected on any reported biceps pain or cosmetic deformity, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score. Results: Thirty-one patients (mean age 65.7 ± 9.7 years, male-to-female ratio 1.6:1, average body mass index 29.7 ± 5.5 kg/m Discussion: A subpectoral biceps tenodesis and transfer technique in rotator cuff repairs demonstrates low rates of postoperative biceps pain and marked increases in shoulder range of motion. Improvements in patient-reported outcome scores (ASES, SANE), coupled with the absence of biceps-related symptoms in all but 2 patients, support the early efficacy of this novel surgical technique in managing rotator cuff tears.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.