ReviewJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2025
Polyethylene wear rates in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of biomechanical studies.
Review in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) was classically indicated in rotator cuff deficient shoulders with osteoarthritis, although its indications and usage worldwide has grown in recent years. Loosening due to polyethylene wear is a significant concern, especially with increasing use of rTSA in younger patients, and as life expectancy increases. In the context of a lack of clinical data on polyethylene wear rates in rTSA, this study aimed to systematically review the biomechanical literature on factors affecting wear rates in rTSA, with comparison between highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) and non-HXLPE being of particular interest given the clinical differences shown in total hip arthroplasty. Methods: The PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were searched for biomechanical studies involving rTSA measuring polyethylene wear rates from April 4, 2024, to inception in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Results: The search returned 1,211 results, of which 380 were duplicates. Of the remaining 831 records, 773 were excluded based on title and 41 based on abstract, leaving 17 studies for full-text review. Nine biomechanical studies were included. One study showed that the wear rates were significantly lower in HXLPE humeral liners as compared to conventional polyethylene liners (36 mm glenosphere: HXLPE 36.5 ± 10 mm Conclusion: HXLPE use in rTSA significantly decreases wear rate as compared to conventional polyethylene in a laboratory-controlled environment. Although this supports the superiority of the biomechanical properties of HXLPE, whether this translates to an improvement in clinical outcomes is undetermined, and limited by the lack of commercially available options despite the ubiquity of HXLPE in prostheses for other joints. Other factors associated with increased wear include larger glenospheres.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.