ArticleJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2025
Gender representation and reimbursement trends in cubital tunnel surgery: a retrospective review of Medicare data from 2013 to 2022.
Article in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most common upper extremity neuropathy and is frequently managed with surgical decompression. While gender disparities have been shown to extend into Medicare reimbursement rates, this has not yet been evaluated among surgeons performing cubital tunnel surgery. This study examines trends among surgeon gender and geographical regions in cubital tunnel surgery volume, reimbursement rates, and patient demographics from 2013 to 2022. Methods: The "Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners-by Provider and Service" dataset was queried for billings of cubital tunnel surgery from 2013 to 2022. Reimbursement rates, surgery volume, patient demographics, and surgeon characteristics were extracted for analysis. The Welch t-test was used to assess for differences based on surgeon gender. Results: From 2013 to 2022, female surgeons performed 8.5% of the 60,029 cubital tunnel surgeries billed to Medicare Part B, with the overall proportion of female surgeons increasing from 4.6% to 9.9%. The largest growth occurred in the Midwest, while there were declines in the Northeast and West. Female surgeons saw a 282.5% increase in surgeries compared to 53.3% for males, and the number of surgeries per female surgeon rose by 30.9%. Patient demographics did not significantly differ over the study period. Reimbursement decreased for all surgeons, with males seeing a 17.7% decrease and females 20.3%, averaging $435 for males and $435.35 for females ( Conclusion: Female surgeon representation in cubital tunnel surgeries increased from 2013 to 2022 but remains under 10%. Though reimbursement does not differ by gender, disparities in procedural volume and regional representation highlight the need to understand systemic and institutional factors to promote equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.