ArticleJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2025
The use of vancomycin powder in total elbow arthroplasty; can we decrease infection risk?
Article in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite advances in implant technology and surgical techniques in total elbow arthroplasty (TEA), there remains a relatively high risk of postoperative infection compared to shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was primarily to investigate the use of intraoperative vancomycin powder (IVP) during TEA in regard to postoperative periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). Methods: A retrospective longitudinal review of patients undergoing TEA over a 22-year study period was performed. A total of 299 patients over the age of 18-years undergoing primary TEA with a minimum 6 months of clinical follow-up were included. A majority of these patients were Caucasian (75.3%; n = 225), female (81.3%; n = 243), and over the age of 65 years (57.5%; n = 172). Native fracture was the most common indication for TEA (48.2%; n = 144), followed by rheumatoid arthritis (33.4%; n = 100) and osteoarthritis (12.7%; n = 38). Results: Seventy-eight patients (26%) received IVP based on surgeon discretion at the time of the procedure. Thirty patients who did not receive IVP went on to develop a PJI (13.5%), compared to 6 patients that did receive IVP (7.7%). However, this was not a statistically significant difference (odds ratio 0.53, Conclusions: The use of IVP was associated with almost half the risk of developing a PJI during primary TEA (13.6% vs. 7.7%). However, this was not statistically significant, likely due to underpowering with a relatively small sample size of patients receiving IVP. The reduction in PJI seen in this IVP cohort has still changed the practice of the authors, who now routinely administer vancomycin powder for total elbow arthroplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.