ArticleJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2025
Subtypes analysis and treatment strategies of Type V SLAP lesions.
Article in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While the shoulder arthroscopic treatment protocols for Type V superior labrum anterior-to-posterior (SLAP) lesions have become popular, there are still some special cases that cannot be adequately addressed by the existing classification and protocols in clinical practice. This article presents a case series and summary of the classification and treatment of such special cases. Methods: Twenty-six cases of Type V SLAP lesions treated at the Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine from June 2016 to March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The labral lesions were observed and recorded during arthroscopic surgery. Repair surgery was subsequently performed depending on the extent of the labrum lesion. Visual Analog Scale, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Disability of the arm, shoulder, and Hhand, Rowe scores, and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index were determined. The healing status after repair was assessed using shoulder magnetic resonance imaging at the 3-month postoperative follow-up. Results: According to the findings of shoulder arthroscopy, the Type V SLAP lesions can be further classified into three subtypes: (1) Bankart lesion combined with Type II SLAP lesion (designated as subtype Va in this study); (2) Bankart lesion combined with Type III SLAP lesion (designated as subtype Vb in this study); (3) Bony Bankart lesion combined with Type II SLAP lesion (designated as subtype Vc in this study). Of the 26 cases, 14 (53%) had a Va-type lesion, 5 (20%) had a Vb-type lesion, and 7 (27%) had a Vc-type lesion.The mean follow-up time was 15 months (range, 14-16 months). At the 3-month postoperative follow-up, all patients showed labral continuity on shoulder magnetic resonance imaging. The visual analog scale score decreased from 4.47 ± 2.80 to 0.04 ± 0.20, whereas the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score improved from 29.12 ± 15.43 to 89.38 ± 3.59. The disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand score improved from 52.62 ± 19.90 to 8.50 ± 3.05, whereas the Rowe score improved from 49.19 ± 19.00 to 89.31 ± 3.56. The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index scores improved from 94.42 ± 9.25 at the 6-month postoperative follow-up to 26.58 ± 8.90 at the final follow-up. Conclusion: Arthroscopic labrum repair is effective in the treatment of Type V SLAP lesions. However, because these lesions present with three distinct subtypes, the surgical procedure should be adapted accordingly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.