ReviewJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2025
Stemless shoulder arthroplasty: what are the benefits?
Review in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Seven-year outcome of a stemless impaction shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective, multicenter study.Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The emergence of stemless shoulder arthroplasty marks a significant advancement, dignified to surpass traditional stemmed approaches. Stemless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (slrTSA) shares benefits with its anatomic counterpart, including reduced complications, bone preservation, and simplified revision. In addition, it offers potential long-term osteological advantages, minimizing stress shielding and, in case of periprosthetic fractures, easier revision. Early data suggest comparable outcomes between slrTSA and stemmed implants, with future benefits. Understanding its advantages, design variations, and clinical outcomes is paramount for its seamless integration into shoulder surgery. A narrative review focused on stemless shoulder arthroplasty was conducted, retrieving recent articles spanning the last decade. Studies examining biomechanics, implantation techniques, and clinical outcomes were critically analyzed by long-term users of stemless implants. Stemless implants exhibit biomechanical advantages, adaptability to patient anatomy, bone preservation, simplified surgical techniques, and less invasive approaches. Notably, they facilitate easier handling of periprosthetic fractures and easier revisions. Clinical outcomes reveal significant improvements in functional scores and pain improvement postoperatively and are comparable to stemmed rTSA. Challenges include patient suitability concerning bone quality. Stemless shoulder arthroplasty represents a paradigm shift in shoulder surgery, with promising mid-term outcomes. However, careful patient selection based on bone quality is crucial. Stemless implants offer significant advantages, particularly for younger adults, warranting continued research and clinical evaluation to optimize patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.