ArticleJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2025
A deep learning algorithm to detect proximal humerus fractures on radiographs.
Article in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Proximal humerus fractures are one of the most common fractures in the elderly. Management of these injuries varies depending on the fracture pattern. It has become recognized that agreement is poor when these fractures are classified according to the most traditional schemes. Deep learning (DL) offers the promise to improve recognition of specific fracture patterns. A first, the necessary step in the development of DL pipelines to automatically classify fractures into specific patterns is to automatically detect that the proximal humerus is actually fractured, so that a fracture pattern DL classifier is not applied to nonfracture x-rays (normal, arthritic, and other). The purpose of this study was to develop a reliable and trustworthy DL approach to detect proximal humerus fractures on radiographs. Methods: After obtaining a patient cohort and reviewing and labeling their associated shoulder images, radiographs of fractured (n = 996) and non-fractured (n = 607) proximal humerus were used for this study. For model training, a random search was performed to fine-tune and determine the training hyperparameters. All radiographs were split into six sets. The first five sets were used for the model development using five-fold cross-validation, and the sixth set was used for internal model testing. The best-performing model was determined using the F1 score on the sixth set and was further validated using an external test set of 116 separate additional radiographs obtained after proximal humerus fractures. Saliency maps were generated for visual understanding of the DL model. Results: The best-performing model from the five-fold cross-validation achieved an accuracy of 0.972 and an F1 score of 0.969 on the hold-out test set. When further validated using the external test set of 116 radiographs of fractured proximal humeri, the model achieved an accuracy/sensitivity of 0.966, misclassifying only 4 of the 116 fractures. The saliency maps showed that the model focused on the perimeter of the humeral head, including the greater tuberosity and the surgical neck, when detecting the fracture. Conclusion: The DL algorithm developed in this study displayed robust and trustworthy performance when detecting the presence of a proximal humerus fracture on radiographs. This algorithm could be implemented in busy emergency department practices so that proximal humerus radiographs with a high probability of fracture can be flagged for dedicated review. In addition, this algorithm provides the first step to further develop other artificial intelligence tools to better understand and manage proximal humerus fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.