ReviewJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2025
The impact of social determinants of health on shoulder instability and likelihood of surgery: a systematic review.
Review in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Arthroscopic Bankart repair following shoulder dislocation results in a lower rate of recurrence and faster return to play when compared to nonoperative treatment in patients with first-time shoulder dislocations. The purpose of this study was to determine if specific social determinants of health are associated with a decreased likelihood of undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair in patients with shoulder instability. Methods: A literature search was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase. Two independent reviewers performed an assessment of the resulting 334 studies, and 23 were selected for full-text review. Inclusion criteria consisted of peer-reviewed journal articles published in the United States from 2010 to present. Publications that were not peer-reviewed (eg, conference abstracts, podium presentations, and commentaries) and systematic reviews were excluded. Covidence was used for data extraction. Risk of bias assessment was performed on the final studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, AXIS tool, and Quality of Health Economic Studies instrument. All studies were designated as high quality or met >80% criteria for low risk of bias. Results: Nine studies across 5 journals met inclusion criteria, evaluating a total of 43,054 patients with shoulder instability. Among the 7 studies that included a gender breakdown, 18,350 (42.6%) of patients were female. There were 5 cohort studies (56%), 2 cross-sectional studies (22%), 1 survey study (11%), and 1 economic and decision analysis (11%). Six studies (67%) evaluated insurance status, 6 (67%) evaluated race and ethnicity, and 3 (33%) evaluated income status. Three studies (33%) included other factors such as social deprivation index and distressed community index. Black race and Hispanic ethnicity, public insurance, lower income quartile, and increased social deprivation were associated with lower rates of arthroscopic Bankart repair. Higher surgical costs were associated with public insurance and below-median income. Patients with public insurance had longer wait times between injury presentation and surgery. Conclusions: Minority race or ethnicity, public insurance status, lower income, and increased social deprivation were found to decrease accessibility and reduce the likelihood of undergoing Bankart repair in patients with shoulder instability. In addition, public insurance was associated with longer wait times between injury presentation and surgery. A delay in treatment for patients with shoulder instability may increase the risk of recurrent instability and the development of additional intra-articular pathology, which can, in turn, lead to worse clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.