Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41179375›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society

Levator-based versus frontalis-based surgeries for poor-function congenital ptosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nada K Abdelsattar, Taha Abd-ElSalam Ashraf Taha, Ziad A Fadl, Omar A Ibrahim, Menna T S Ali, Hossam K Farouk, Mostafa M Diab

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nada K Abdelsattar *Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Al-Fayoum, Egypt.
Taha Abd-ElSalam Ashraf Taha *Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Al-Fayoum, Egypt.
Ziad A FadlFaculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Al-Fayoum, Egypt.
Omar A IbrahimFaculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Al-Fayoum, Egypt.
Menna T S AliFaculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Al-Fayoum, Egypt.
Hossam K FaroukFaculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Al-Fayoum, Egypt.
Mostafa M DiabDepartment of Ophthalmology, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The choice of surgery for congenital ptosis remains an ongoing debate. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of levator-based versus frontalis-based surgeries, specifically focusing on ptosis with poor levator function. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Studies comparing levator-based and frontalis-based surgical techniques in congenital ptosis patients were included. Sixteen studies were included. Meta-analysis revealed no significant differences regarding postoperative marginal reflex distance 1 (MRD1) or change in MRD1 in poor levator function cases and overall pooled studies. Levator-based surgeries had lower risk of recurrence and implant- or suture-related complications. Postoperative lagophthalmos was comparable between the two groups. In conclusion, both levator-based and frontalis-based surgeries achieve satisfactory outcomes for congenital ptosis, including cases with poor levator function. Large, randomized trials with long-term follow-up are needed.

Indexed as

Congenital ptosisfrontalis-based surgerieslevator-based surgeriespoor levator function

Identifiers

PMID41179375
PMCPMC12578425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.