Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41179363›Full record

ArticleFood science & nutrition2025

Optimization of Pre-Treatments to Overcome Stickiness-Related Hurdles and Enhance Drying Efficiency in Apple Pomace.

Hyo Jun Won, Ae-Jin Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hyo Jun WonFood Tech Resources Research Division, National Institute of Crop and Food Science (NICS), Rural Development Administration (RDA) Wanju-Gun Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5149-6060
Ae-Jin ChoiFood Tech Resources Research Division, National Institute of Crop and Food Science (NICS), Rural Development Administration (RDA) Wanju-Gun Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4700-4899

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Apple pomace (AP), a major by-product of apple juice processing, poses environmental and economic challenges because of its high moisture content, leading to storage difficulties and microbial degradation. Moreover, the high sugar content of AP contributes to stickiness during drying, which causes material agglomeration and limits efficient moisture removal-representing a significant hurdle in the drying process. Sustainable utilization of AP requires efficient drying methods to enhance its stability and usability. This study hypothesizes that enzymatic and ethanol pre-treatments can significantly improve the drying efficiency of AP by alleviating stickiness-related barriers. The objective was to optimize pre-treatment conditions to maximize moisture removal while potentially maintaining the quality of dried AP. Experiments were conducted using different ethanol concentrations, enzyme types (Pectinase, Cellulase), and treatment durations, with drying efficiency evaluated based on the removed moisture content (RMC) under various pre-treatment conditions. Under optimal conditions-combining Pectinase and Cellulase enzyme treatments with ethanol pre-treatment-the RMC increased from 12% (control) to 67%, representing a 5.5-fold improvement in drying efficiency. These findings demonstrate that optimized pre-treatments can effectively mitigate stickiness-induced drying hurdles, enhance AP drying efficiency, reduce waste, and support sustainable food processing. The proposed approach contributes to minimizing the environmental footprint of the apple processing industry. Future research should focus on scaling up these pre-treatment techniques and assessing their economic feasibility for industrial applications.

Indexed as

apple pomacedrying efficiencyenzymeethanolpre‐treatmentsstickiness

Identifiers

PMID41179363
PMCPMC12571961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.