Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41179341›Full record

ArticleMDM policy & practice

Exploring Key Elements of Surgical Shared Decision Making for Providers and Older Adults.

Gabriela Poles, Mariah Erlick, Alexis Zimmer, Marcia Russell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MDM policy & practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gabriela PolesUniversity of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6002-3058
Mariah ErlickOregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Alexis ZimmerUniversity of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Marcia RussellUniversity of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Highlights: Critical components of shared decision making (SDM) identified in this study include understanding patient values, building trust, understanding the patient's baseline function, and defining possible treatment outcomes.Specific components of SDM in older adults include navigating companions to conversations and the challenges of navigating potential postoperative changes to cognitive or physical function.Possible areas to improve SDM include improved dissemination of SDM resources; the importance of communication skills and empathy and an emphasis on additional training for this, particularly for trainees; improved engagement of patients in the SDM process; and using other care team members such as palliative care and social work when appropriate.

Indexed as

geriatric surgeryolder adultsshared decision making

Identifiers

PMID41179341
PMCPMC12576029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.