Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41179323›Full record

ReviewCancer diagnosis & prognosis

Renal Epithelioid Angiomyolipomas: Clinicopathological Features, Diagnosis, and Management.

Kathrine S Rallis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer diagnosis & prognosis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kathrine S RallisBarts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, U.K.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renal angiomyolipomas (AMLs) are typically benign, fat-rich mesenchymal tumours composed of vascular, smooth muscle, and adipose elements. However, rare fat-poor subtypes, particularly epithelioid angiomyolipoma (EAML), pose significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to their malignant potential and morphological overlap with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). EAML represents less than 1% of AMLs but differs markedly in its biological behaviour, with a propensity for local invasion, lymphadenopathy, and distant metastasis, most commonly to the lungs and liver. Preoperative diagnosis is often delayed or incorrect, as imaging may fail to detect fat-deficient lesions, making histopathological evaluation necessary. EAML is defined by sheets of polygonal epithelioid cells with eosinophilic or clear cytoplasm, prominent nucleoli, and frequent mitotic figures. Genetic alterations in TSC1/TSC2 and activation of the mTOR pathway are central to pathogenesis, particularly in tuberous sclerosis complex-associated cases. Management hinges on surgical resection, yet recurrence and metastasis may occur years after nephrectomy. mTOR inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy in tumour reduction, especially in TSC-linked cases, while VEGF pathway inhibitors and immune checkpoint blockade represent promising but underexplored avenues. Prognostic features include tumour size >9 cm, necrosis, vascular invasion, and high epithelioid cell proportion. Given the rarity and aggressive potential of EAML, long-term surveillance and multidisciplinary care are essential. Continued research into molecular drivers and targeted therapies will be critical to improving diagnostic precision and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Angiomyolipomaimmunotherapyrenal cell carcinomareviewtargeted therapytyrosine kinase inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID41179323
PMCPMC12577627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.