ArticleCancer diagnosis & prognosis
Comparison of Intracorporeal Isoperistaltic and Antiperistaltic Anastomoses in Robotic-assisted Surgery for Right-sided Colon Cancer.
Article in Cancer diagnosis & prognosis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The effectiveness and safety of isoperistaltic versus antiperistaltic side-to-side ileocolic anastomosis in minimally invasive radical right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Aim: To date, several clinical trials have compared isoperistaltic and antiperistaltic anastomosis; however, in the context of robot-assisted surgery (RAS), a consensus on the optimal approach has yet to be established. This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of intracorporeal isoperistaltic and antiperistaltic side-to-side anastomoses in RAS for right-sided colon cancer. Patients and Methods: A retrospective subgroup analysis was conducted using a database collected from a Japanese multicenter prospective study. Patients diagnosed with curatively resectable right-sided colon cancer (cStage I-IIIC) who underwent RAS with intracorporeal anastomosis were included. Surgical and postoperative outcomes were compared between the isoperistaltic and antiperistaltic anastomosis groups. Results: Among the 78 patients analyzed, 23 (29.5%) underwent antiperistaltic anastomosis and 55 (70.5%) underwent isoperistaltic anastomosis. There were no significant differences in age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status score, previous abdominal surgical history, or clinical stage between the groups. Isoperistaltic anastomosis was more frequently performed in ascending and transverse colon cancers, whereas antiperistaltic anastomosis was more frequent in cecal cancers. Right hemicolectomy was significantly more frequent in the isoperistaltic group than in the antiperistaltic group (92.7% Conclusion: This study demonstrated equivalent short-term outcomes between intracorporeal isoperistaltic and antiperistaltic anastomoses in RAS for right-sided colon cancer. Both techniques appear to be safe and effective, supporting the recommendation that surgeons maintain proficiency in both methods to allow flexibility based on intraoperative conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.