Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41179281›Full record

ReviewBJR open2025

Case-based review of low-field MRI in resource-constrained settings: a clinical perspective from Malawi.

Karen Chetcuti, Cowles Chilungulo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJR open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Karen ChetcutiRadiology Division, Department of Paediatrics and Children Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, BT3, Malawi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9768-9494
Cowles ChilunguloBlantyre Malaria Project, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, BT3, Malawi.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-field MRI (LF-MRI) is in the spotlight as multidisciplinary experts consider it to be one solution to expanding MRI access worldwide. The clinical scenarios and case-mix in which LF-MRI could play an especially important role in the patient diagnostic algorithm are different in High and Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMIC). The aim of this article is to suggest a robust structure within which to envision clinical use and advancement of LF-MRI technology in LMICs. This article presents three discrete clinical scenarios-a tertiary care facility with an LF-MRI only, a tertiary care facility with an LF-MRI and an HF-MRI and a peripheral healthcare facility with an LF-MRI only-derived from a combination of the authors' observed practice and hypothetical models in an LMIC and 31 consecutive case reviews within a 32-month timeframe of our experience with the 0.064 T Hyperfine Swoop in Malawi. The authors recognize the important of a holistic approach to the ongoing multifaceted efforts at LMIC-appropriate advancement of LF-MRI technology. This ranges from continued innovation relating to deep learning methods for improved diagnostic accuracy and workflow efficiency, empowerment towards building LF-MRIs in-situ in the LMIC and multidisciplinary capacity building initiatives in LMICs.

Indexed as

low-field MRIlow-middle income countriesresource constrained settings

Identifiers

PMID41179281
PMCPMC12579540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.