ArticleFrontiers in big data2025
Analyzing student mental health with RoBERTa-Large: a sentiment analysis and data analytics approach.
Article in Frontiers in big data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analyzing digital consumer insights through RoBERTa LLM based sentiment analysis and topic modeling.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A multimodal deep learning approach for mental health classification of university students: an intelligent early warning system.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Predicting student mental health through entropy-based features and interpretable cross-attention transformer networks.PloS one · 2026Article
- Learning semantic similarity from sentence pairs using hybrid features centric approach and explainable siamese neural networks.PloS one · 2026Article
- Exploring the Relationship Between Perceived Social Support and Psychological Resilience Among Chinese Adolescents in Post-Pandemic Online Learning Contexts: The Mediating Role of Loneliness.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mental health of students plays an important role in their overall wellbeing and academic performance. Growing pressure from academics, co-curricular activities such as sports and personal challenges highlight the need for modern methods of monitoring mental health. Traditional approaches, such as self-reported surveys and psychological evaluations, can be time-consuming and subject to bias. With advancement in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly in natural language processing (NLP), sentiment analysis has emerged as an effective technique for identifying mental health patterns in textual data. However, analyzing students' mental health remains a challenging task due to the intensity of emotional expressions, linguistic variations, and context-dependent sentiments. In this study, our primary objective was to investigate the mental health of students by conducting sentiment analysis using advanced deep learning models. To accomplish this task, state-of-the-art Large Language Model (LLM) approaches, such as RoBERTa (a robustly optimized BERT approach), RoBERTa-Large, and ELECTRA, were used for empirical analysis. RoBERTa-Large, an expanded architecture derived from Google's BERT, captures complex patterns and performs more effectively on various NLP tasks. Among the applied algorithms, RoBERTa-Large achieved the highest accuracy of 97%, while ELECTRA yielded 91% accuracy on a multi-classification task with seven diverse mental health status labels. These results demonstrate the potential of LLM-based approaches for predicting students' mental health, particularly in relation to the effects of academic and physical activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.