Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41179185›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

AI-Powered Workflow for Constructing Organic Materials Databases from the Literature: Integrating Large Language Models.

Hang Hu, Henry J Stirrat, Adam Alayli, Akinori Saeki, Yue Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hang HuMolecular Engineering & Science Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States.
Henry J StirratDept. Materials Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States.
Adam AlayliMorsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33602, United States.
Akinori SaekiDepartment of Applied Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7429-2200
Yue HuangDept. Materials Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9927-1243

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed an end-to-end workflow to automate the construction of materials science databases from published literature, addressing a traditionally manual, time-intensive, and labor-intensive process. The work systematically evaluates and compares different machine learning (ML) methods to optimize each task. For identifying relevant publications, we tested various ML techniques and concluded that a combination of large language model (LLM)-based embeddings, clustering, and direct LLM queries is most effective. In the subsequent data extraction phase, we employed OpenAI's GPT-4 to extract materials and their properties, achieving accuracy comparable to manually curated data sets. Additionally, we integrated AI/ML methods to automatically generate SMILES from chemical structure images, expanding the workflow's applicability to organic materials. To validate the workflow, we applied it to studying organic donor materials in organic photovoltaic devices and benchmarked its performance against a manually curated data set derived from 503 papers. The results demonstrate the workflow's efficiency and accuracy. Finally, based on our findings, we provide recommendations for selecting the best ML methods for each task and propose further improvements for the future tool development. This workflow represents a major advancement in accelerating the development of materials science databases and enables data science applications in a broader range of research topics that were historically infeasible due to the lack of available data sets.

Identifiers

PMID41179185
PMCPMC12572996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.