ArticleACS omega2025
Predicting the Optical Properties of Gold Nanoclusters Using Machine Learning Approach.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application-Driven Modular Design of Gold Nanoclusters for In Vivo Fluorescence Imaging.Small methods · 2026Review
- Predicting the Optical Properties of Gold Nanoclusters Using Machine Learning Approach.ACS omega · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The synthesis of gold nanoclusters (AuNC) is strongly influenced by various reaction conditions, and their optical properties are determined by factors such as the nature of the ligand and the measuring solvent, among others. To improve the efficiency of the synthesis of metallic gold nanoclusters with the desired functionality, the application of machine learning techniques is a smart choice. In this study, a model based on the GXBoost algorithm is proposed to predict the maximum emission wavelength of the AuNC emission from a database that includes more than 200 scientific articles. The validation of the model was carried out through the comparison of prediction versus experimental data (not included in the model) and the training and validation data. The model showed a percentage error of 1.7, 1.6, and 4.9%, respectively, indicating a reasonable return. Additionally, an independent regression was performed when the ligand was a thiolated compound different from GSH, obtaining a training and test error percentage of 0.01 and 3%, respectively. In addition, critical variables affecting the optical properties of nanoclusters were explored, and techniques such as One-Hot Encoding were used to prepare the data. Finally, this work not only underscores the relevance of AuNCs in modern science highlighted but also demonstrates the potential of machine learning as a predicting tool and design of materials in nanoscience, contributing to the optimization of their properties for future applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.