Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41179124›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

Impact of Residual Zwitterionic Surfactants on Topside Water-Oil Separation of Pre-Salt Light Crude Oil Emulsions.

Bruno G Alvarenga, Angela C P Duncke, Aurora Pérez-Gramatges, Ana M Percebom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bruno G AlvarengaLaboratory of Surfactant Physical-Chemistry (LASURF), Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 22451-900, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9187-355X
Angela C P DunckeLaboratory of Surfactant Physical-Chemistry (LASURF), Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 22451-900, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4341-5735
Aurora Pérez-GramatgesLaboratory of Surfactant Physical-Chemistry (LASURF), Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 22451-900, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5951-6130
Ana M PercebomDepartment of Chemistry, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 22451-900, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1511-8656

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zwitterionic surfactants have been used as foaming agents in Enhanced Oil Recovery due to their foamability, tolerance to reservoir conditions, low toxicity, and low adsorption on reservoir rocks. However, in the case of back-production, the impact of zwitterionic surfactants on water-in-crude oil (W/O) emulsions and produced water remains unclear, representing a knowledge gap in the field. The present study evaluated the effect of three commercial zwitterionic surfactants, at concentrations ranging from 50 to 1000 ppm, on water-oil separation using a Brazilian Pre-Salt crude oil. Emulsion formation, separation kinetics, and water quality were assessed through bottle tests, droplet size microscopy, and oil-in-water content analysis. At the lowest concentration (50 ppm), these surfactants promoted coalescence and sedimentation of W/O emulsions faster than traditional nonionic and anionic surfactants. Separation kinetics increased as surfactant concentration increased up to 200 ppm, but concentrations above 500 ppm induced the formation of multiple emulsions (W/O/W). After 72 h, these emulsions separated, and the aqueous phase still contained residual oil droplets, indicating potential challenges associated with the disposal or reuse of produced water. Surfactant hydrophobicity, reduction in interfacial tension, and critical micelle concentration were critical properties influencing the observed effects. The surfactant with higher hydrophobicity induced a more significant and rapid reduction in interfacial tension, resulting in faster W/O separation at low concentrations but compromising water quality at high concentrations. These results indicate that careful selection and monitoring of surfactants during EOR operations can optimize oil recovery efficiency while minimizing operational and environmental risks upstream.

Identifiers

PMID41179124
PMCPMC12573017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.