ArticleACS omega2025
Impact of Residual Zwitterionic Surfactants on Topside Water-Oil Separation of Pre-Salt Light Crude Oil Emulsions.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Zwitterionic surfactants have been used as foaming agents in Enhanced Oil Recovery due to their foamability, tolerance to reservoir conditions, low toxicity, and low adsorption on reservoir rocks. However, in the case of back-production, the impact of zwitterionic surfactants on water-in-crude oil (W/O) emulsions and produced water remains unclear, representing a knowledge gap in the field. The present study evaluated the effect of three commercial zwitterionic surfactants, at concentrations ranging from 50 to 1000 ppm, on water-oil separation using a Brazilian Pre-Salt crude oil. Emulsion formation, separation kinetics, and water quality were assessed through bottle tests, droplet size microscopy, and oil-in-water content analysis. At the lowest concentration (50 ppm), these surfactants promoted coalescence and sedimentation of W/O emulsions faster than traditional nonionic and anionic surfactants. Separation kinetics increased as surfactant concentration increased up to 200 ppm, but concentrations above 500 ppm induced the formation of multiple emulsions (W/O/W). After 72 h, these emulsions separated, and the aqueous phase still contained residual oil droplets, indicating potential challenges associated with the disposal or reuse of produced water. Surfactant hydrophobicity, reduction in interfacial tension, and critical micelle concentration were critical properties influencing the observed effects. The surfactant with higher hydrophobicity induced a more significant and rapid reduction in interfacial tension, resulting in faster W/O separation at low concentrations but compromising water quality at high concentrations. These results indicate that careful selection and monitoring of surfactants during EOR operations can optimize oil recovery efficiency while minimizing operational and environmental risks upstream.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.