Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41179104›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Student Perspectives on Campus-Based Mental Health Initiatives: Insights From an Urban Indian Context.

Seema Mehrotra, Rohit Jaiswal, Sangeeta Menon, Tanvi Agarwal, Manjula Munivenkatappa, Neha Dahiya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Seema MehrotraClinical Psychology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, IND.
Rohit JaiswalClinical Psychology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, IND.
Sangeeta MenonClinical Psychology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, IND.
Tanvi AgarwalClinical Psychology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, IND.
Manjula MunivenkatappaClinical Psychology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, IND.
Neha DahiyaPreventive Medicine, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Stress and mental health challenges are common among students, and educational campuses can play an important role in promoting mental well-being. Research on preventive and promotive interventions in educational settings highlights the importance of understanding students' perspectives and engaging them as key stakeholders. This study explored the views of urban Indian students on strategies to support mental health, including their involvement in program implementation, the role of peer support, and the use of self-help resources. Methods We conducted a qualitative, exploratory, descriptive study using focus group discussions (FGDs) to examine student perspectives on themes related to the study objectives. Sixty-nine participants were recruited through purposive sampling from five diverse educational institutions representing both public and private institutes catering to students from grade 9 through undergraduate levels (n = 69; five institutions) in the Bengaluru Urban district of Karnataka state in India. FGDs were audio-recorded and supplemented with detailed field notes. Data were thematically analyzed using a hybrid inductive-deductive approach. Results Six themes and 17 subthemes emerged from the analysis of student FGDs. Students reported unmet needs for campus mental health promotion and described stressors including depression, examination-related anxiety, family and societal expectations, bullying, isolation, and difficulty managing negative emotions alongside limited awareness of available help. They called for sensitizing parents and teachers and for training teachers to build connections, recognize distress, and respond supportively. Participants prioritized a supportive campus climate with visible mental health information (e.g., classroom discussions and assemblies), safe spaces, inclusive activities, and dedicated time that reduces academic pressure and enables self-care and skill-building. Students endorsed peer engagement (e.g., training peer champions and strengthening peer support systems) to raise awareness, encourage help-seeking, and support navigation of academic and social challenges. They valued self-help resources but cited barriers to sustained use (e.g., motivation, stigma, and time); they favored interactive, technology-enabled materials and cautious use of social media given risks of distraction and misinformation. Finally, they advocated for formal, easily accessible counseling with clear pathways, strong confidentiality, and individualized care, and expressed mixed views on helplines, balancing the benefits of anonymity against doubts about effectiveness. Conclusions This study found that students view campus-based mental health promotion as a priority and identified several essential components for success: sensitization of parents, teacher preparation to recognize and respond to distress, structured peer support, integration of mental health into the academic schedule, supportive environments that reduce stigma, engaging self-help resources enhanced by technology, and confidential, personalized counseling services. Implementing programs that reflect these priorities can foster earlier recognition of distress, increase help-seeking, and improve well-being, offering a practical and culturally relevant approach to addressing youth mental health in educational settings.

Indexed as

community mental healthcommunity psychiatryhealth promotionmental healthstudent support services

Identifiers

PMID41179104
PMCPMC12574610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.