ReviewCureus2025
PD1/PD-L1 Axis Blockers in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety Outcomes.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- PD-L1 Expression and Immune Microenvironment Remodeling During Laryngeal Carcinogenesis: Implications for Malignant Progression of Laryngeal Dysplasia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancers of the head and neck are common, and this review aimed to systematically analyze the safety and efficacy of anti-PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors (API) therapies in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). This is a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showcasing the safety and efficacy of APIs in HNSCC. An online literature search of PubMed, Cochrane database, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted till May 31, 2024, to identify RCTs involving anti-PD1/PD-L1 therapies in oral cancer. The data were analyzed using Review Manager (RevMan) (Cochrane, London, United Kingdom), and the risk of bias was assessed for methodological quality. This study included nine RCTs with 3933 study participants. API treatment showed a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) compared to standard therapy in HNSCC (hazard ratio (HR) =0.85 (0.76,0.95), I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.