Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41179050›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

A Comparative Study of Premixed Versus Succedent Administration of Dexmedetomidine and Bupivacaine in the Subarachnoid Block for Infraumbilical Surgeries.

Lily S Bodra, Dipali Singh, Bharati Bharati, Shio Priye, Saurabh Toppo, Sourabh Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lily S BodraDepartment of Anaesthesiology, MGM Medical College and Hospital, Jamshedpur, IND.
Dipali SinghDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, IND.
Bharati BharatiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, IND.
Shio PriyeDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, IND.
Saurabh ToppoDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Bhagwan Mahavir Manipal Hospital, Ranchi, IND.
Sourabh KumarDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe suggested method for infraumbilical surgeries is spinal anaesthesia. Postoperative pain management is challenging, as spinal anaesthesia utilising solely local anaesthetics provides only a short analgesic effect. Therefore, early pain relief is necessary in the postoperative period. AIMS AND

objectivesIn this study, dexmedetomidine and bupivacaine were administered either premixed in a single syringe or sequentially in separate syringes for subarachnoid block in infraumbilical surgeries across different study groups. We compared the sensory and motor block characteristics, intra-operative hemodynamics, postoperative pain relief, and any side-effects in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgeries. The effect of administering dexmedetomidine before bupivacaine heavy and vice versa on these parameters was also assessed. METHODOLOGY: The study involved 120 patients, as classified by the "American Society of Anaesthesiologists", physical status I and II, all scheduled for lower abdominal procedures (gynaecological, urological, orthopaedic, and other lower abdominal procedures) under spinal anaesthesia. Three groups of patients were randomly selected: Group A received two intrathecal injections. The first injection consisted of 5 mcg of dexmedetomidine diluted in preservative-free normal saline (0.5 mL), followed by 12.5 mg of 0.5% heavy bupivacaine (2.5 mL), both in separate 3 mL syringes. In Group B, participants received intrathecal injections of premixed solution divided into two separate 3 mL syringes, one with 2.5 mL and the other with 0.5 mL of premixed solution. A premixed solution (3 mL) was made with 5 mcg of dexmedetomidine diluted in 0.5 mL of preservative-free normal saline and 12.5 mg of 0.5% heavy bupivacaine (2.5 mL). Group C participants were given two consecutive intrathecal injections, first 12.5 mg of 0.5% heavy bupivacaine (2.5 mL) using a 3 mL syringe and 5 mcg of dexmedetomidine diluted in preservative-free normal saline (0.5 mL) in a second 3 mL syringe. Statistical analysis has been performed utilizing Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS, version 20; IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY).

resultsThe earliest average onset time for sensory block has been observed in Group A, which was monitored by Groups B and C. Group C had the lowest average onset time for motor block, followed by Groups A and B. Groups A and C experienced sensory and motor blockage for more extended periods. Compared to Groups A and C, Group B patients have a greater incidence of bradycardia as well as hypotension.

conclusionsThe research illustrates that, in contrast to spinal anaesthesia with a premixed dosage of hyperbaric bupivacaine and dexmedetomidine, sequential intrathecal injection produces a longer sensory and motor block with a quicker onset.

Indexed as

bupivacainedexmedetomidinepremixedsubarachnoid blocksuccedent

Identifiers

PMID41179050
PMCPMC12573054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.