ReviewCureus2025
Chrononutrition and Diabetes: Mapping the Scientific Landscape Through Bibliometric Insights.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chrononutrition, an emerging field at the interface of circadian biology, nutrition, and metabolic health, has gained increasing attention in the context of diabetes research. To capture the evolution and current state of this domain, we conducted a bibliometric analysis of publications indexed in the Scopus database until August 31, 2025. The dataset comprised 1,629 documents retrieved across 678 sources, which were analyzed using Biblioshiny and VOSviewer. The analysis revealed an annual growth rate of 11.41%, reflecting steady and accelerating global interest in the role of meal timing and circadian rhythms in diabetes. The United States, China, and Australia emerged as the most productive countries, while the University of Illinois at Chicago, Adelaide Medical School, and Universiteit van Amsterdam ranked as leading institutions. International collaboration was extensive, with the United States acting as a central hub connecting research networks across continents. Citation trends showed increasing influence of the field after 2000, peaking between 2010 and 2018, followed by a relative decline in recent years. Thematic mapping highlighted the following three major clusters (keyword co-occurrence): clinical trials on glycemic control and lifestyle, experimental animal studies on circadian biology, and dietary interventions such as time-restricted feeding and intermittent fasting. This study underscores the multidisciplinary growth of chrononutrition in diabetes research, highlights its translational potential for clinical practice, and identifies opportunities for broader global participation and culturally diverse interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.