ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2025
Redefining
Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Postmortem bioelectrical impedance analysis: Exploratory Assessment of phase angle behavior across different postmortem intervals.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Cardiac blood phenethylamine as a potential biomarker for post-mortem interval in forensic autopsy cases.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Application of artificial intelligence in the determination of the postmortem interval: Systematic review of the literature and metaanalysis.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Review
- Serum S100B level as biomarker of traumatic deaths: correlations with injury patterns and postmortem interval.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Article
- Postmortem pancreatic autolysis as a histological marker of early postmortem interval: a forensic autopsy study in a tropical setting.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026Article
- Postmortem Microbiology in Forensic Diagnostics: Interpretation of Infectious Causes of Death and Emerging Applications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Classical methods for
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.