Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41178939›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2025

Exercise and nutrition strategies for sarcopenia in older adults: evidence from a network meta-analysis based on EWGSOP and AWGS criteria.

Rongting Zhao, Yangjian Dong, Quansheng Zheng, Jiwei Yao

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rongting ZhaoCollege of Physical Education and Health, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, Guangxi, China.
Yangjian DongCollege of Physical Education and Health, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, Guangxi, China.
Quansheng ZhengCollege of Physical Education and Health, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, Guangxi, China.
Jiwei YaoCollege of Physical Education and Health, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, Guangxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This network meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of different exercise and nutritional interventions on muscle strength, skeletal muscle mass, and physical function in older adults with sarcopenia diagnosed according to the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People and Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia criteria. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to July 2025. A Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis was performed, with additional subgroup and meta-regression analyses. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) framework, and interventions were ranked according to their relative effectiveness and certainty of evidence. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251124534). Results: A total of 35 randomised controlled trials involving 2,331 participants were included. Exercise combined with nutritional supplementation was the most effective intervention for improving handgrip strength (MD = 3.69, 95% CrI 0.72 to 5.10; SUCRA 99.04%), gait speed (MD = 0.11, 95% CrI 0.03 to 0.17; SUCRA 87.12%), and appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (ASMI) (MD = 0.35, 95% CrI 0.19 to 0.49; SUCRA 99.82%), with improvements in handgrip strength and ASMI significantly greater than those achieved with Exercise or Nutrition alone. Exercise alone improved handgrip strength, gait speed, and ASMI, whereas protein supplementation alone improved handgrip strength and gait speed but had no significant effect on ASMI. Subgroup analyses indicated that resistance training with protein supplementation produced the most significant improvements in handgrip strength and gait speed. In contrast, resistance training with protein and vitamin D supplementation was most effective for improving ASMI. Meta-regression analysis did not identify any significant sources of heterogeneity. Conclusion: These findings support combined exercise and nutritional interventions as a preferred treatment option for improving muscle strength, muscle mass, and physical function in older adults with sarcopenia. However, the overall certainty of the evidence ranged from low to very low. In particular, multicomponent exercise programmes centred on resistance training and combined with protein supplementation may offer superior benefits for enhancing muscle strength and physical function.

Indexed as

exercisenutritionolder adultsresistance trainingsarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID41178939
PMCPMC12571659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.