ReviewWorld journal of clinical oncology2025
Circulating tumor DNA in biliary tract cancers: A review of current applications.
Review in World journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Bile Cell-Free DNA as a Tumor-Proximal Source for Molecular Profiling of Biliary Tract Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Translational and Implementation Barrier in the Management of Biliary Tract Cancer: Diagnostic, Molecular, Therapeutic, and Patient-Centered Challenges.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
- Endobiliary Photodynamic Therapy in Cholangiocarcinoma: Clinical Outcomes, Patient Selection, and Procedural Context.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Practical integration of ctDNA-defined minimal residual disease in gastrointestinal cancers: testing windows and evidence-aligned management frameworks.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Circulating Tumor DNA in Cholangiocarcinoma: A Precision Oncology Roadmap.Cancer management and research · 2026Review
- Advancing systemic therapy for biliary tract cancer: current strategies and emerging paradigms.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Metabolic collusion driving immune evasion in cholangiocarcinoma: unmasking the dual control of the immuno-metabolic microenvironment.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molecular profiling of biliary tract cancers (BTCs) has paved the way for a broader range of therapeutic options, leading to improved survival outcomes. Given the challenges of tissue evaluation in BTCs, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising non-invasive biomarker for genomic profiling. Bile has been proven to be a reliable ctDNA source, demonstrating higher concordance with tumor tissue than plasma. More importantly, ctDNA provides valuable insights into both clonal evolution and treatment response, including the detection of resistance mechanisms and mutation clearance, which are often associated with disease control. Although its role in recurrence monitoring remains investigational, early studies suggest that ctDNA detection may precede radiological recurrences. This review examines recent advancements in ctDNA analysis for patients with BTC, highlighting key developments, current clinical implications, and ongoing challenges. Large-scale prospective studies are needed to validate the clinical utility of ctDNA and to support its integration into BTC management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.