ReviewWorld journal of clinical oncology2025
Radiotherapy treatment time delay evidence, part I: Update on cervical, anal, prostate, and head and neck cancers.
Review in World journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Timeliness of Primary Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer in Queensland: A 10 Year Rural-Urban Retrospective Cohort Study.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2026Article
- Prediction of Residual Disease in Unresectable Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.World journal of oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment delays during radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) are a well-established factor negatively affecting clinical outcomes, with similar trends observed in other cancers. In this first part of a two-part review, we assessed the impact of overall treatment time (OTT) prolongation on locoregional control (LRC) and survival (SV) in cervical cancer (CC), prostate cancer (PC), and anal cancer (AC), while updating evidence for HNC. A comprehensive literature search was performed in evidence-based databases, including MEDLINE, identifying studies evaluating the relationship between OTT prolongation and outcomes. Particular attention was paid to the strength of evidence, distinguishing univariate analysis from multivariate analysis (MV-An). For CC, 37 articles were identified, with 88.8% reporting a detrimental impact on LRC and/or SV, mostly supported by MV-An. In AC, 15 studies were found, with 33.3% showing negative impacts, although with weaker evidence. For PC, 12 articles were reviewed, with 66.6% demonstrating detrimental effects mainly on LRC or biochemical control, and occasional associations with cancer-specific SV. Recent studies in HNC reinforced prior findings. When available, radiobiological parameters and practical recommendations are provided. In conclusion, strong evidence confirms that prolonged OTT worsens outcomes in HNC and CC, with less consistent but relevant effects in PC and AC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.