ArticleWorld journal of clinical oncology2025
Surgeons' opinions about enhanced recovery after surgery for retroperitoneal sarcoma: A survey.
Article in World journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs provide recommendations for an optimized management of patients undergoing surgery. An ERAS program tailored on surgery for retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) may improve patient outcomes and it has still not been established.
aimTo determine how an ERAS program tailored to RPS surgery can be agreed upon, structured, and implemented.
methodsTwenty-five candidate items from existing ERAS programs, potentially relevant for RPS surgery, were identified
resultsThirteen sarcoma surgeons from 6 centers participated in the survey. Although surgeons agreed on several items, their overall concordance was low. After recirculating the survey, the intra-observer reproducibility was low. Interestingly, the median concordance with the reference increased for relevance and decreased for feasibility.
conclusionDespite interest in ERAS for RPS, surgeon concordance on item relevance and feasibility remains low, underscoring the need for collaborative efforts toward a standardized, consensus-based protocol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.