ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2025
Indications and techniques for minimally invasive spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy.
Review in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robotic versus laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: a propensity score-matched study of the "splenic artery and vein plane first" strategy.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- The role of preoperative 3D reconstruction in optimizing surgical planning and intraoperative guidance during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a pilot study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP) has gained increasing attention as a safe and effective alternative to distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy, particularly for benign and low-grade malignant lesions of the pancreatic body and tail. This narrative review evaluates the current evidence, technical considerations, and disease-specific indications for SPDP. Literature was reviewed using up to date scientific evidence and most recent national and international guidelines. Studies addressing SPDP outcomes, splenectomy complications, and disease-specific oncologic principles were included. Spleen preservation has been associated with reduced rates of postoperative infections, thromboembolic events, and long-term immunologic compromise, without compromising oncologic outcomes in selected patients. Indications favoring SPDP include pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, and solid pseudopapillary neoplasms. Although current guidelines generally recommend splenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, emerging data suggest that spleen preservation may be feasible in highly selected cases. Technical approaches-primarily the Kimura and Warshaw techniques-enable safe dissection and splenic vessel management, particularly with the support of minimally invasive platforms. In conclusion, SPDP should be considered in appropriately selected patients to reduce morbidity while preserving long-term immune function. Future randomized studies are warranted to define oncologic safety and refine indications across tumor types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.