Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41178871›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2025

Advancements in endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Techniques, outcomes, and perspectives.

Jie Wu, Zhen-Dong Jin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jie WuDepartment of Respiratory and Oncology, The 72nd Group Army Hospital of PLA, Huzhou 313000, Zhejiang Province, China.
Zhen-Dong JinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China. zhendongjin@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract and arise from the interstitial cells of Cajal. They predominantly affect individuals between 50 and 70 years of age and often carry malignant potential despite being frequently asymptomatic. The stomach and small intestine are the most common locations, while involvement of the esophagus, colon, or rectum is relatively rare. GISTs are often discovered incidentally during endoscopic or radiologic evaluations, and the diagnosis is confirmed through tissue biopsy and immunohistochemical staining, particularly for KIT (CD117), DOG1, and PDGFRA. In the past decade, laparoscopic resection has been considered the standard treatment for localized GISTs smaller than 5 cm. However, recent advances in endoscopic technology have led to a growing role for endoscopic resection as a safe and effective treatment option for selected nonmetastatic GISTs. Endoscopic techniques such as endoscopic submucosal dissection, endoscopic submucosal excavation, submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection, and endoscopic full-thickness resection have demonstrated favorable outcomes, including high complete resection (R0) rates, shorter hospital stays, and quicker recovery compared to traditional surgery. The selection of an appropriate resection method depends on tumor size, location, depth of invasion, and proximity to vital structures. Endoscopic ultrasound has become an essential tool for preprocedural assessment, providing detailed information on tumor characteristics and helping to guide management decisions. While endoscopic resection is a promising minimally invasive approach, it should be performed by skilled endoscopists with appropriate training due to the technical complexity and risk of complications such as bleeding or perforation. This review summarizes recent developments in endoscopic resection of GISTs, with a focus on indications, procedural safety, clinical outcomes, and recommendations for optimal patient selection and procedural planning.

Indexed as

Endoscopic full-thickness resectionEndoscopic resectionEndoscopic submucosal dissectionGastrointestinal stromal tumorsInterventional endoscopyMinimally invasive treatmentSubmucosal tunneling endoscopic resection

Identifiers

PMID41178871
PMCPMC12576642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.