ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2025
Postoperative recovery and bleeding risk after endoscopic snare cold resection in patients with 5-15 mm colorectal polyps.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndoscopic cold snare resection (CSP) can enhance postoperative recovery and minimize bleeding risk in patients with 5-15 mm colorectal polyps. However, more detailed evaluations are required to assess their advantages over conventional methods.
aimTo evaluate the effects of endoscopic CSP on postoperative recovery and bleeding risk in patients with 5-15 mm colorectal polyps.
methodsThis randomized controlled study included 193 patients (mean age: 57.91 ± 5.41 years; 97 men and 96 women) with 5-15 mm colorectal polyps treated at Dongyang People's Hospital between March and June 2023. The patients were randomly assigned to the experimental group (
resultsThe CSP group had significantly shorter operation times (15.02 ± 2.44 minutes
conclusionCSP was safe and efficient for removing 5-15 mm colorectal polyps, offering faster recovery and comparable safety to EMR. The procedural efficiency of CSP supports its broad clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.