Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41178638›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association2026

Impact of Approach Routes in MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy on Post-Biopsy Complications: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Hiroki Tanaka, Masaki Kobayashi, Shunya Matsumoto, Yudai Ishikawa, Shohei Fukuda, Hiroshi Fukushima, Yuma Waseda, Yosuke Yasuda, Hajime Tanaka, Soichiro Yoshida and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Impact of Approach Routes in MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy on Post-Biopsy Complications: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hiroki TanakaDepartment of Urology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3003-3833
Masaki KobayashiDepartment of Urology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2738-9792
Shunya MatsumotoDepartment of Urology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4459-4384
Yudai IshikawaDepartment of Urology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Shohei FukudaDepartment of Urology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroshi FukushimaDepartment of Urology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7548-1580
Yuma WasedaDepartment of Urology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9319-1373
Yosuke YasudaDepartment of Urology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hajime TanakaDepartment of Urology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3632-2901
Soichiro YoshidaDepartment of Urology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2757-8083
Yasuhisa FujiiDepartment of Urology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6761-3229

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to assess the association between post-biopsy complications and approach routes in MRI-ultrasound fusion biopsy (FB) using propensity score-matched analysis to adjust for patient background characteristics.

methodsThis retrospective study included 778 FB-naïve patients who underwent FB for suspected prostate cancer between June 2017 and November 2022. Patients were consecutively assigned to transrectal FB (TR-FB) and transperineal FB (TP-FB) groups. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for age, prostate volume, number of targeted lesions, diabetes, pre-existing pyuria, and the use of antithrombotic drugs between the groups. Post-biopsy complications, including hematuria, acute prostatitis, urinary retention, and rectal bleeding, were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0, and the incidence rates were compared. Multivariable analysis was performed to explore the risk factors for grade ≥ 2 acute prostatitis.

resultsOverall, 427 and 351 patients underwent TR-FB and TP-FB, respectively. In the matched cohort, grade ≥ 2 acute prostatitis occurred significantly more frequently in the TR-FB group than in the TP-FB group (3.4% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.006). A similar difference was observed in grade 3 acute prostatitis (2.2% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.015). No significant differences were observed in any other complications. Multivariable analysis identified the TR approach (odds ratio [OR] 12.11, p = 0.018) and use of antithrombotic drugs (OR 5.07, p = 0.018) as independent risk factors for grade ≥ 2 acute prostatitis.

conclusionTP-FB was associated with a significantly lower risk of acute prostatitis than TR-FB, suggesting that the transperineal approach should be considered from a safety perspective.

Indexed as

Image-Guided BiopsyMagnetic Resonance Imaging, InterventionalPostoperative ComplicationsProstateProstatic NeoplasmsProstatitisUltrasonography, InterventionalAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerineumPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsUrinary Retentioncomplicationsimage‐guided biopsyinfectionsprostate cancerprostatitis

Identifiers

PMID41178638
PMCPMC12830167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.