Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41178624›Full record

ReviewMovement disorders clinical practice2026

Clinical and Radiological Evolution of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Critical Review.

David Campo-Caballero, Elissa Ash, Alfonso Fasano, Davide Martino, Mats Tullberg, Araceli Alonso Canovas, Joachim K Krauss

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Movement disorders clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Association between p-tau181 in cerebrospinal fluid and shunt response in patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David Campo-CaballeroDepartment of Neurology, Movement Disorders Unit, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4143-0210
Elissa AshDepartment of Neurology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Alfonso FasanoDepartment of Medicine, Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5346-0180
Davide MartinoDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2217-0487
Mats TullbergHydrocephalus Research Unit, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Araceli Alonso CanovasMovement Disorders Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Joachim K KraussDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0675-9064

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe pathophysiology of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) remains poorly understood. While it is commonly accepted that iNPH has an insidious onset, little is known about its preclinical and early stages and its development over time.

objectivesTo gain more insight into how iNPH becomes manifest clinically and radiologically, and how its major clinical symptoms evolve in non-shunted patients.

methodsFor this critical review a literature search was performed using specific search terms concerning the evolution of iNPH. Manuscripts were categorized according to their content providing information on different domains including the early manifestation of clinical features, the evolution of the three major clinical symptoms, and the development of radiological findings.

resultsGait disturbance in general, is the earliest clinical symptom of iNPH. There is a gradual but variable decline within the first years resulting in a change of phenotype. Cognitive impairment varies widely depending on co-morbidities. Urinary dysfunction evolves from urinary urgency to incontinence. Radiological features of iNPH such as ventricular enlargement, enlarged subarachnoid spaces, and flattening of sulci at the parasagittal high convexity are present in the preclinical stage of iNPH, but the sequence of their appearance remains unclear as well as the impact of white matter lesions.

conclusionsThe evolution of iNPH shows remarkable heterogeneity. While there is a need to define distinct clinical stages, it is also important to better identify the preclinical stages of iNPH. Assessment of treatment outcomes needs to consider the stage of the disease at the time of intervention.

Indexed as

Hydrocephalus, Normal PressureDisease ProgressionGait Disorders, NeurologicHumanscognitive impairmentcritical reviewgait disturbanceidiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalusurinary dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID41178624
PMCPMC13042910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.