Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41178600›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2026

Interventions to Prevent Patient- and Visitor-Perpetrated Violence Against Nurses in the Emergency Department: A Scoping Review.

Mariarosaria Gammone, Daniela Cattani, Martina Barbieri, Andrea Moro, Milko Zanini, Gianluca Catania, Loredana Sasso, Fiona Timmins, Annamaria Bagnasco

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mariarosaria GammoneDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2870-7935
Daniela CattaniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1214-7811
Martina BarbieriDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0038-2486
Andrea MoroDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2818-3211
Milko ZaniniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1081-6279
Gianluca CataniaDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0862-071X
Loredana SassoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5886-5937
Fiona TimminsSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7233-9412
Annamaria BagnascoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9079-8460

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo identify interventions and strategies to prevent patient- and visitor-perpetrated violence against nurses working in acute hospital Emergency Departments. Design Scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines.

methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed and CINAHL to identify relevant studies published up to June 2024. The review included primary research studies employing quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method approaches. Eligibility criteria focused on interventions aimed at preventing physical and verbal violence in acute hospital emergency settings, explicitly targeting nurses. The selection process followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines, with independent screening and data extraction by two reviewer pairs. Data Sources PubMed and CINAHL databases were searched for studies published up to June 2024.

resultsA total of 40 studies were included, covering interventions across 11 countries, mostly from the United States. Interventions were categorised as organisational, environmental, or individual-focused. Training programs were the most common strategy, followed by risk assessment tools, defense strategies, multidisciplinary briefings, and technology-assisted interventions. Most interventions (73%) were implemented before violent incidents, 23% during, and 5% after. Healthcare workers, particularly nurses, were the primary target group, highlighting the need for effective preventive strategies.

conclusionViolence prevention interventions in Emergency Departments focus on pre-incident strategies, mainly organisational and individual-focused. Limited attention has been given to environmental interventions despite their role in mitigating workplace violence. Further research is needed to assess the long-term effectiveness of these strategies. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Addressing workplace violence in EDs ensures a safer work environment, improves staff retention, and enhances patient care quality. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.

Indexed as

Emergency NursingEmergency Service, HospitalNursing Staff, HospitalVisitors to PatientsWorkplace ViolenceHumansmultiprofessional educationnurse ‐ patient interactionviolence

Identifiers

PMID41178600
PMCPMC13356330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.