ArticleClinical chemistry and laboratory medicine2026
Creatinine measurement from finger stick dried blood spots with a routine chemistry analyzer for estimation of GFR.
Article in Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesMeasuring creatinine levels is essential for assessing kidney function. However, traditional venous sampling poses challenges in terms of sample collection, storage, and transportation. Recently, dried blood spot (DBS) analysis has emerged as a potential alternative for measuring creatinine levels, although its clinical application remains limited. Creatinine measurements from DBS could facilitate chronic kidney disease screening, medication management, and at-home patient monitoring.
methodsPrecision and hematocrit effect were assessed according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute protocols to validate creatinine measurements in DBS. Subsequently, the protocol was applied in a method comparison involving 115 patients. Lastly, robustness was assessed by investigating creatinine stability over time and the influence of spotting effects.
resultsCreatinine measurements in DBS resulted in low bias and correcting for hematocrit further improved accuracy. A comparison of creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between venous plasma and finger stick DBS showed an R
conclusionsIn conclusion, creatinine from DBS can be analyzed using an automated high-throughput chemistry analyzer, enabling accurate eGFR classification. This method may support blood sampling at home for screening programs, patient follow-up, and medication management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41178591What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.